Artwork

Contenido proporcionado por Paul Weber. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Paul Weber o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
Player FM : aplicación de podcast
¡Desconecta con la aplicación Player FM !

090 The Hierarchy of Evidence

24:15
 
Compartir
 

Manage episode 441564546 series 3498945
Contenido proporcionado por Paul Weber. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Paul Weber o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

Send us a text

https://www.paulbweber.com/complete-athlete-process
I see a problem with how evidence is valued in the CrossFit community.
It seems like personal experience and understanding of "the methodology" are all that matter in the eyes of many CrossFitters.
This belief is difficult to defend.
First, you must believe that personal experience is more valuable than any other source of insight.
So-and-so has the answers because he's jacked, won the CrossFit Games, etc.
That's valuable experience, no doubt.
But it has to be weighed against evidence from other sources. Sources that are, in almost every case, stronger than personal experience.
Second, you must believe that theory is capable of explaining all problems related to training.
Have a problem? Constantly varied. Functional movement. High intensity.
This is a high burden of proof to place on a theory.
"The methodology" is not sufficient to be considered evidence. It is only a theory.
In order for "the methodology" to produce evidence it has to be tested, like any other theory.
When people contradict a statement based on "the methodology" I have to end the conversation.
We are not valuing evidence the same way, so there's no progress that can be made.
I believe there's a hierarchy of evidence. Insight can come from many places. The stronger the evidence, the more suggestive power it has.
Personal experience is at the bottom of this hierarchy. Promising? Yes. Conclusive? Not very.
Above personal experience is "expert opinion." This is where a lot of coaches live.
Expert opinion is stronger, in most cases, than personal experience because the sample size is larger.
Above personal experience and expert opinion we have scientific literature.
I have heard the belief that because there isn't much literature on CrossFit, we can't learn much from research.
We certainly have to be careful in our interpretation and application of all research, but there are loads of studies that apply to CrossFit.

  • Studies on elite athletes in other sports
  • Concurrent training studies
  • Studies that help us better understand exercise physiology

These, when carefully interpreted and applied, can be a strong source of insight for those who do CrossFit.
Ideally, you have all three sources of insight to support how you train.
Personal experience suggests it, experts suggest it, research supports it.
That's what will lead to the best guidance for athletes, and the best future performances in our sport.
If you're a coach, constantly go after all three sources of insight.

  • Train - get your personal experience.
  • Coach - get your clinical experience.
  • Learn - practice understanding, interpreting and applying research.

Everything has to be put to the test. And not just once - over and over again.
My promise to you is to constantly put everything I teach to the test.
I don't exist only in the realm of theory. I train myself and I train clients, I have skin in the game.
I invite you to join me and seek insight that can help athletes in CrossFit.
I invite you to test everything.
We start Thursday, September 26th.
https://www.paulbweber.com/complete-athlete-process

  continue reading

101 episodios

Artwork
iconCompartir
 
Manage episode 441564546 series 3498945
Contenido proporcionado por Paul Weber. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Paul Weber o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

Send us a text

https://www.paulbweber.com/complete-athlete-process
I see a problem with how evidence is valued in the CrossFit community.
It seems like personal experience and understanding of "the methodology" are all that matter in the eyes of many CrossFitters.
This belief is difficult to defend.
First, you must believe that personal experience is more valuable than any other source of insight.
So-and-so has the answers because he's jacked, won the CrossFit Games, etc.
That's valuable experience, no doubt.
But it has to be weighed against evidence from other sources. Sources that are, in almost every case, stronger than personal experience.
Second, you must believe that theory is capable of explaining all problems related to training.
Have a problem? Constantly varied. Functional movement. High intensity.
This is a high burden of proof to place on a theory.
"The methodology" is not sufficient to be considered evidence. It is only a theory.
In order for "the methodology" to produce evidence it has to be tested, like any other theory.
When people contradict a statement based on "the methodology" I have to end the conversation.
We are not valuing evidence the same way, so there's no progress that can be made.
I believe there's a hierarchy of evidence. Insight can come from many places. The stronger the evidence, the more suggestive power it has.
Personal experience is at the bottom of this hierarchy. Promising? Yes. Conclusive? Not very.
Above personal experience is "expert opinion." This is where a lot of coaches live.
Expert opinion is stronger, in most cases, than personal experience because the sample size is larger.
Above personal experience and expert opinion we have scientific literature.
I have heard the belief that because there isn't much literature on CrossFit, we can't learn much from research.
We certainly have to be careful in our interpretation and application of all research, but there are loads of studies that apply to CrossFit.

  • Studies on elite athletes in other sports
  • Concurrent training studies
  • Studies that help us better understand exercise physiology

These, when carefully interpreted and applied, can be a strong source of insight for those who do CrossFit.
Ideally, you have all three sources of insight to support how you train.
Personal experience suggests it, experts suggest it, research supports it.
That's what will lead to the best guidance for athletes, and the best future performances in our sport.
If you're a coach, constantly go after all three sources of insight.

  • Train - get your personal experience.
  • Coach - get your clinical experience.
  • Learn - practice understanding, interpreting and applying research.

Everything has to be put to the test. And not just once - over and over again.
My promise to you is to constantly put everything I teach to the test.
I don't exist only in the realm of theory. I train myself and I train clients, I have skin in the game.
I invite you to join me and seek insight that can help athletes in CrossFit.
I invite you to test everything.
We start Thursday, September 26th.
https://www.paulbweber.com/complete-athlete-process

  continue reading

101 episodios

ทุกตอน

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenido a Player FM!

Player FM está escaneando la web en busca de podcasts de alta calidad para que los disfrutes en este momento. Es la mejor aplicación de podcast y funciona en Android, iPhone y la web. Regístrate para sincronizar suscripciones a través de dispositivos.

 

Guia de referencia rapida

Escucha este programa mientras exploras
Reproducir