Artwork

Contenido proporcionado por The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
Player FM : aplicación de podcast
¡Desconecta con la aplicación Player FM !

Is The Case Of Karen Read Too Broken To Re-try?

8:07
 
Compartir
 

Manage episode 434032039 series 3569233
Contenido proporcionado por The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," defense attorney Bob Motta discusses the potential future of the Karen Read case, particularly if it goes to a retrial. The conversation highlights the numerous challenges facing the prosecution, including the involvement of problematic figures like lead investigator Proctor and others under investigation. Motta suggests that the Commonwealth might drop the murder charge in favor of pursuing manslaughter, a more appropriate charge given the evidence. He advises the defense to focus on the scientific testimony from independent experts rather than leaning into conspiracy theories about what may have happened in the house, which could be difficult for jurors to accept. The discussion also touches on the complexities of juror perceptions, especially when theories about the incident are too controversial or implausible. Motta argues that the defense should stick to the straightforward narrative that there's reasonable doubt due to the lack of definitive proof, especially given the credibility of the independent experts. The conversation ends with speculation on how the case might unfold if it goes to trial again.
**Main Points:**
- Discussion on the possibility of a retrial for Karen Read and the likelihood of the Commonwealth dropping the murder charge.
- The involvement of problematic figures like investigator Proctor complicates the case for the prosecution.
- Motta suggests the defense should focus on the scientific testimony from independent experts rather than conspiracy theories.
- Concerns about juror perceptions and the risks of presenting controversial or implausible theories.
- Emphasis on reasonable doubt due to the lack of definitive proof, supported by credible independent experts.
- Speculation on how the retrial could unfold and whether it will differ from the initial trial.
**Hashtags:**
#KarenRead #BobMotta #Proctor #DefenseDiaries #ManslaughterCase #IndependentExperts #HiddenKillersPodcast
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

439 episodios

Artwork
iconCompartir
 
Manage episode 434032039 series 3569233
Contenido proporcionado por The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," defense attorney Bob Motta discusses the potential future of the Karen Read case, particularly if it goes to a retrial. The conversation highlights the numerous challenges facing the prosecution, including the involvement of problematic figures like lead investigator Proctor and others under investigation. Motta suggests that the Commonwealth might drop the murder charge in favor of pursuing manslaughter, a more appropriate charge given the evidence. He advises the defense to focus on the scientific testimony from independent experts rather than leaning into conspiracy theories about what may have happened in the house, which could be difficult for jurors to accept. The discussion also touches on the complexities of juror perceptions, especially when theories about the incident are too controversial or implausible. Motta argues that the defense should stick to the straightforward narrative that there's reasonable doubt due to the lack of definitive proof, especially given the credibility of the independent experts. The conversation ends with speculation on how the case might unfold if it goes to trial again.
**Main Points:**
- Discussion on the possibility of a retrial for Karen Read and the likelihood of the Commonwealth dropping the murder charge.
- The involvement of problematic figures like investigator Proctor complicates the case for the prosecution.
- Motta suggests the defense should focus on the scientific testimony from independent experts rather than conspiracy theories.
- Concerns about juror perceptions and the risks of presenting controversial or implausible theories.
- Emphasis on reasonable doubt due to the lack of definitive proof, supported by credible independent experts.
- Speculation on how the retrial could unfold and whether it will differ from the initial trial.
**Hashtags:**
#KarenRead #BobMotta #Proctor #DefenseDiaries #ManslaughterCase #IndependentExperts #HiddenKillersPodcast
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

439 episodios

Όλα τα επεισόδια

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenido a Player FM!

Player FM está escaneando la web en busca de podcasts de alta calidad para que los disfrutes en este momento. Es la mejor aplicación de podcast y funciona en Android, iPhone y la web. Regístrate para sincronizar suscripciones a través de dispositivos.

 

Guia de referencia rapida