))
23-713 Bufkin v. McDonough, Sec. of VA [10/16/24]
Manage episode 451642510 series 3618198
Contenido proporcionado por Better Informed Network. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Better Informed Network o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
The case Bufkin v. McDonough. The central issue concerns the standard of review for the Veterans Court's assessment of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of the "benefit-of-the-doubt" rule. Petitioners argue for a less deferential review, emphasizing the statute's intent to ensure meaningful scrutiny of the agency's decisions. The respondent defends the current deferential standard, asserting that the statute clarifies, rather than changes, existing practice. The justices' questioning explores the nuances of legal versus factual determinations within the benefit-of-the-doubt analysis and the practical implications of different standards of review.
27 episodios
Compartir
