))
23-217 E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera [11/05/24]
Manage episode 451683840 series 3618198
Contenido proporcionado por Better Informed Network. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Better Informed Network o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
The case E.M.D. Sales, Inc., et al. v. Faustino Sanchez Carrera, et al. The central issue concerns the appropriate standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence versus clear and convincing evidence—for determining whether employees fall under an exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime requirements. The Petitioners argue for the default preponderance standard, while the Respondents advocate for a heightened standard, citing the importance of FLSA protections and the potential for employer manipulation of evidence. The Justices' questions explore the implications of various standards and the Court's precedents regarding proof standards in similar cases. The arguments address whether the public interest warrants a departure from the typical preponderance standard and the implications for both employers and employees.
27 episodios
Compartir
