))
OpenAI ChatGPT 4 v4: Debate, Criteria, Responsibilities, Integrity | Turn the Lens Ep34
Manage episode 428730979 series 3240393
Contenido proporcionado por Jeff Frick. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Jeff Frick o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
Debate.
There has been lots of talk lately about debates, winners, and losers. I didn’t have any debate team friends in high school or college, and have not been to a real debate. If there are winners and losers, that would imply that there are rules, as victory in most competitions, from basketball to chess to Family Feud, is based on performance within the constraints, the rules, of the competition.
If basketball players carry the ball, or travel, or employ moving screens, then it’s no longer basketball (at least according the National Junior Basketball Association rules my kids played under).
So I went to Anita Iverson, my OpenAI ChatGPT to find out more about the rules, procedures, and what determines winners and losers in competitive debate.
Here’s what I learned about debates from Anita.
OpenAI ChatGPT 4 v4: Debate, Criteria, Responsibilities, Integrity | Turn the Lens with Jeff Frick Ep34
YouTube - Click Here
Transcript - Click Here
#Debate #Rules #Procedures #CodeOfConduct #Criteria #Responsibilities #Integrity #NSDA #WUDC #DebateRules #LincolnDouglas #Argumentation #Ethics #Evidence #EvidenceIntegrity #Rules #Regulation #Moderators #ModeratorsResponsibilities #CNN #Scoring #ScoringCriteria #Competition #PublicSpeaking #Cross #CrossExamination #EthicalDebating #ModeratorRoles #Judge #JudgingFairness #DebateFormats #CriticalThinking
39 episodios
Compartir
