Artwork

Contenido proporcionado por Sage Publications and SAGE Publications Ltd.. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Sage Publications and SAGE Publications Ltd. o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
Player FM : aplicación de podcast
¡Desconecta con la aplicación Player FM !

What outcomes do studies use to measure the impact of prognostication on people with advanced cancer? Findings from a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

4:52
 
Compartir
 

Manage episode 376613825 series 1316808
Contenido proporcionado por Sage Publications and SAGE Publications Ltd.. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Sage Publications and SAGE Publications Ltd. o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

This episode features Caitlin Spooner (Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK).

What is already known about the topic?

- Currently, there is no gold standard for evaluating how different methods of prognosticating in advanced cancer impact on patient care.

- Prognostic models are principally evaluated by their statistical performance, determining their discrimination and calibration. However, before any prognostic model can be recommended for use in clinical practice, it is necessary to demonstrate whether or not it has a beneficial impact on patient care.

- There is a lack of consensus among stakeholders about how to assess the impact of prognostication in advanced cancer, with prognostic studies varying in the outcomes they select.

What this paper adds?

- We identified a wide variety of outcomes and measures used in published studies, which makes inter-study comparability problematic.

- Our findings highlight the widespread effect that prognostication in advanced cancer has on patients and informal caregivers.

- The lived experiences of patients and informal caregivers regarding prognostication in advanced cancer are not always represented in the outcomes quantitative prognostic studies measure.

Implications for practice, theory, or policy

- Further research is needed to identify and prioritise outcomes to measure the impact of prognostication in advanced cancer.

- Patients’ and informal caregivers’ experiences and perspectives should always be incorporated when evaluating the impact of prognostication.

- Outcome selection in prognostication studies needs to be more consistent and standardised.

Full paper available from:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02692163231191148

If you would like to record a podcast about your published (or accepted) Palliative Medicine paper, please contact Dr Amara Nwosu:

a.nwosu@lancaster.ac.uk

  continue reading

115 episodios

Artwork
iconCompartir
 
Manage episode 376613825 series 1316808
Contenido proporcionado por Sage Publications and SAGE Publications Ltd.. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Sage Publications and SAGE Publications Ltd. o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

This episode features Caitlin Spooner (Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK).

What is already known about the topic?

- Currently, there is no gold standard for evaluating how different methods of prognosticating in advanced cancer impact on patient care.

- Prognostic models are principally evaluated by their statistical performance, determining their discrimination and calibration. However, before any prognostic model can be recommended for use in clinical practice, it is necessary to demonstrate whether or not it has a beneficial impact on patient care.

- There is a lack of consensus among stakeholders about how to assess the impact of prognostication in advanced cancer, with prognostic studies varying in the outcomes they select.

What this paper adds?

- We identified a wide variety of outcomes and measures used in published studies, which makes inter-study comparability problematic.

- Our findings highlight the widespread effect that prognostication in advanced cancer has on patients and informal caregivers.

- The lived experiences of patients and informal caregivers regarding prognostication in advanced cancer are not always represented in the outcomes quantitative prognostic studies measure.

Implications for practice, theory, or policy

- Further research is needed to identify and prioritise outcomes to measure the impact of prognostication in advanced cancer.

- Patients’ and informal caregivers’ experiences and perspectives should always be incorporated when evaluating the impact of prognostication.

- Outcome selection in prognostication studies needs to be more consistent and standardised.

Full paper available from:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02692163231191148

If you would like to record a podcast about your published (or accepted) Palliative Medicine paper, please contact Dr Amara Nwosu:

a.nwosu@lancaster.ac.uk

  continue reading

115 episodios

Todos los episodios

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenido a Player FM!

Player FM está escaneando la web en busca de podcasts de alta calidad para que los disfrutes en este momento. Es la mejor aplicación de podcast y funciona en Android, iPhone y la web. Regístrate para sincronizar suscripciones a través de dispositivos.

 

Guia de referencia rapida

Escucha este programa mientras exploras
Reproducir