Artwork

Contenido proporcionado por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
Player FM : aplicación de podcast
¡Desconecta con la aplicación Player FM !

Episode 32: Impartialitas

1:01:55
 
Compartir
 

Manage episode 413429941 series 3449375
Contenido proporcionado por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, we discuss objectivity and disinterestedness in science. We talk about norms, values, interests, and objectivity in research practice, peer review, and hiring decisions. Is it possible to be completely objective? Is objectivity a feature of epistemic products or epistemic processes? And most importantly, how would you objectively rate this podcast?

Shownotes

  • Armstrong, J. S. (1979). Advocacy and objectivity in science. Management Science, 25(5), 423–428.
  • Declaration of Interest by Stephen Senn: http://senns.uk/Declaration_Interest.htm
  • Djørup, S., & Kappel, K. (2013). The norm of disinterestedness in science; a restorative analysis. SATS, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2013-0009
  • Elliott, K. C. (2017). A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001
  • Feyerabend, Paul. "How to defend society against science." Philosophy: Basic Readings (1975): 261-271.
  • Jamieson, K. H., McNutt, M., Kiermer, V., & Sever, R. (2019). Signaling the trustworthiness of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19231–19236. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913039116
  • Janack, M. (2002). Dilemmas of objectivity. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 267-281.
  • John, S. (2021). Objectivity in science. Cambridge University Press.
  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
  • Mitroff, I. I. (1974). Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094423
  • Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subjective side of science: A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists (First Edition). Elsevier.
  • A Russian polar researcher has been charged trying to stab a colleague to death at a remote Antarctic base https://www.businessinsider.com/sergey-savitsky-alleged-attempted-murder-at-antarctic-bellingshausen-2018-10
  • Stamenkovic, P. (2023). Facts and objectivity in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2150807

  continue reading

69 episodios

Artwork

Episode 32: Impartialitas

Nullius in Verba

19 subscribers

published

iconCompartir
 
Manage episode 413429941 series 3449375
Contenido proporcionado por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, we discuss objectivity and disinterestedness in science. We talk about norms, values, interests, and objectivity in research practice, peer review, and hiring decisions. Is it possible to be completely objective? Is objectivity a feature of epistemic products or epistemic processes? And most importantly, how would you objectively rate this podcast?

Shownotes

  • Armstrong, J. S. (1979). Advocacy and objectivity in science. Management Science, 25(5), 423–428.
  • Declaration of Interest by Stephen Senn: http://senns.uk/Declaration_Interest.htm
  • Djørup, S., & Kappel, K. (2013). The norm of disinterestedness in science; a restorative analysis. SATS, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2013-0009
  • Elliott, K. C. (2017). A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001
  • Feyerabend, Paul. "How to defend society against science." Philosophy: Basic Readings (1975): 261-271.
  • Jamieson, K. H., McNutt, M., Kiermer, V., & Sever, R. (2019). Signaling the trustworthiness of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19231–19236. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913039116
  • Janack, M. (2002). Dilemmas of objectivity. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 267-281.
  • John, S. (2021). Objectivity in science. Cambridge University Press.
  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
  • Mitroff, I. I. (1974). Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094423
  • Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subjective side of science: A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists (First Edition). Elsevier.
  • A Russian polar researcher has been charged trying to stab a colleague to death at a remote Antarctic base https://www.businessinsider.com/sergey-savitsky-alleged-attempted-murder-at-antarctic-bellingshausen-2018-10
  • Stamenkovic, P. (2023). Facts and objectivity in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2150807

  continue reading

69 episodios

Todos los episodios

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenido a Player FM!

Player FM está escaneando la web en busca de podcasts de alta calidad para que los disfrutes en este momento. Es la mejor aplicación de podcast y funciona en Android, iPhone y la web. Regístrate para sincronizar suscripciones a través de dispositivos.

 

Guia de referencia rapida

Escucha este programa mientras exploras
Reproducir