Artwork

Contenido proporcionado por Mark Dawes. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Mark Dawes o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
Player FM : aplicación de podcast
¡Desconecta con la aplicación Player FM !

Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical or Mechanical Restraint

7:52
 
Compartir
 

Manage episode 330314557 series 2422841
Contenido proporcionado por Mark Dawes. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Mark Dawes o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical or Mechanical Restraint.

Every now and then I hear someone stating things like "Staff must use the least restrictive method when restraining a patient" etc.

Or "any physical intervention must be the least restrictive option", or words to that effect.

However, those statements are wrong.

They are wrong because they are being used in the wrong context.

I do understand the principle, ethics and morality argument.

No one wants staff rushing in and immediately resorting to high level techniques where they are not required. But that isn't the point I'm raising here.

The point is the term "least restrictive" has nothing to do with a physical or mechanical use of force option.

Let me explain.

To read the full blog post click here - https://nfps.info/why-the-term-least-restrictive-has-nothing-to-do-with-physical-or-mechanical-restraint/

  continue reading

183 episodios

Artwork
iconCompartir
 
Manage episode 330314557 series 2422841
Contenido proporcionado por Mark Dawes. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Mark Dawes o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.

Why The Term 'Least Restrictive' Has Nothing To Do With Physical or Mechanical Restraint.

Every now and then I hear someone stating things like "Staff must use the least restrictive method when restraining a patient" etc.

Or "any physical intervention must be the least restrictive option", or words to that effect.

However, those statements are wrong.

They are wrong because they are being used in the wrong context.

I do understand the principle, ethics and morality argument.

No one wants staff rushing in and immediately resorting to high level techniques where they are not required. But that isn't the point I'm raising here.

The point is the term "least restrictive" has nothing to do with a physical or mechanical use of force option.

Let me explain.

To read the full blog post click here - https://nfps.info/why-the-term-least-restrictive-has-nothing-to-do-with-physical-or-mechanical-restraint/

  continue reading

183 episodios

Todos los episodios

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenido a Player FM!

Player FM está escaneando la web en busca de podcasts de alta calidad para que los disfrutes en este momento. Es la mejor aplicación de podcast y funciona en Android, iPhone y la web. Regístrate para sincronizar suscripciones a través de dispositivos.

 

Guia de referencia rapida

Escucha este programa mientras exploras
Reproducir