))
'Parliamentary Sovereignty and Where We Are Now after the Supreme Court Rwanda Judgment': CULS Panel discussion (audio)
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on January 16, 2025 15:36 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 385556452 series 2681418
Contenido proporcionado por Daniel Bates and Cambridge University. Todo el contenido del podcast, incluidos episodios, gráficos y descripciones de podcast, lo carga y proporciona directamente Daniel Bates and Cambridge University o su socio de plataforma de podcast. Si cree que alguien está utilizando su trabajo protegido por derechos de autor sin su permiso, puede seguir el proceso descrito aquí https://es.player.fm/legal.
Dr Tom Hickman KC, who represented Gina Miller in both Miller cases and the Lord Advocate in the recent Scottish Independence Referendum reference, was joined by Dr Stefan Theil (professor in Public Law) to delve deeply into the current constitutional status of Parliamentary Sovereignty. - Dr Tom Hickman KC: Overruling the Supreme Court’s Rwanda Judgment – what role now for Parliament? - Dr Stefan Theil: Preventing judicial review of the Rwanda policy: practical and legal difficulties For more information see the CULS website at: https://culs.org.uk This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.
…
continue reading
553 episodios
Compartir
