Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court's website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
Free Law Project
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Government court cases
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)


1
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Jake Leahy
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only. Hosted by a non-attorney.*
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
T
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation


1
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
Hemant Mehta
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
T
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast

1
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
Robaire Taylor, Chris Young, Henri Taylor
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
T
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court


1
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
L
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court

1
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
Aaron Larson
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court


1
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
The Term is a podcast from Law360 for the busy U.S. Supreme Court watcher. Give us about 15 minutes each week and we'll catch you up on all the big action at the nation's highest court, along with a list of what to watch in the coming sessions. Hosts senior Supreme Court reporter Jimmy Hoover in Washington, D.C. and editor-at-large Natalie Rodriguez in New York City cut through a busy docket to focus on the key cases and developments everyone will be talking about.
…
continue reading
A
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision

1
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision
Get A Life Media, Billy Crone
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859 [Arg: 11.29.2023]
2:16:41
2:16:41
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:16:41
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): (1) Whether statutory provisions that empower the Securities and Exchange Commission to initiate and adjudicate administrative enforcement proceedings seeking civil penalties violate the Seventh Amendment; (2) whether statutory provisions that authorize the SEC to choose to enforce the securities laws through an agency…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Leading Seaman C.D. Edwards, et al. v. His Majesty the King (39820)
2:10:27
2:10:27
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:10:27
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) The appellants are members of the Canadian Armed Forces who had various charges laid against them. They each filed a preliminary application in the Court Martial seeking a stay of proceedings because of an alleged infringement of their constitutional right to be tried by an independent and impartial tribunal guaranteed by …
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy
2:16:40
2:16:40
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:16:40
A case in which the Court will decide whether the statutory scheme that empowers the Securities and Exchange Commission violates the Seventh Amendment, the nondelegation doctrine, or Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
Brown v. United States
1:12:51
1:12:51
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:12:51
Brown v. United StatesPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court


The nine Supreme Court justices handed down a surprise unanimous decision binding themselves to a new code of ethics. It comes after criticism over undisclosed perks for some of the justices. Amna Nawaz unpacked the court's new rules with Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis specializing in legal and government ethi…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Wilkinson v. Garland, No. 22-666 [Arg: 11.28.2023]
1:30:23
1:30:23
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:30:23
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether an agency determination that a given set of established facts does not rise to the statutory standard of “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), or whether this determination is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under S…
…
continue reading
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits a second prosecution for a crime of which a defendant was previously acquitted. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Por Austin Songer
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Brown v. U.S., No. 22-6389 [Arg: 11.27.2023]
1:24:50
1:24:50
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:24:50
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits a second prosecution for a crime of which a defendant was previously acquitted.
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Wilkinson v. Garland
1:30:22
1:30:22
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:30:22
A case in which the Court will decide whether an agency determination that a given set of established facts does not rise to the statutory standard of “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), or instead is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under Section 1252…
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Brown v. United States
1:24:50
1:24:50
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:24:50
A case in which the Court will decide whether the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense.…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Rudisill v. McDonough, No. 22-888 [Arg: 11.8.2023]
1:10:17
1:10:17
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:10:17
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill and the Post-9/11 GI Bill is entitled to receive a total of 48 months of education benefits as between both programs, without first exhausting the Montgomery benefit in order to obtain the more generous…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
U.S. v. Rahimi, No. 22-915 [Arg: 11.7.2023]
1:32:41
1:32:41
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:32:41
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment on its face. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Por Austin Songer
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, No. 22-846 [Arg: 11.6.2023]
1:18:29
1:18:29
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:18:29
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the civil-liability provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act unequivocally and unambiguously waive the sovereign immunity of the United States. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Por Austin Songer
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Vidal v. Elster, No. 22-704 [Arg: 11.1.2023]
1:15:48
1:15:48
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:15:48
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the refusal to register a trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c) violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Por Austin Songer
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, No. 22-324 [Arg: 10.31.2023]
1:40:35
1:40:35
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:40:35
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official’s personal social media account, when the official uses the account to feature their job and communicate about job-related matters with the public, but does not do so pursuant to any governmental…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Lindke v. Freed, No. 22-611 [Arg: 10.31.2023]
1:17:22
1:17:22
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:17:22
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether a public official’s social media activity can constitute state action only if the official used the account to perform a governmental duty or under the authority of his or her office. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Por Austin Songer
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Culley v. Marshall, No. 22-585 [Arg: 10.30.2023]
1:39:56
1:39:56
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:39:56
Question Presented: Issue(s): Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
City of St. John’s v. Wallace Lynch, et al. (40302)
2:41:11
2:41:11
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:41:11
In 1991, Newfoundland and Labrador reorganized its northeast Avalon municipalities, expanding St. John’s boundaries and triggering a new planning process for St. John’s. The Lynch property and others were zoned as “watershed” because they fall within the Broad Cove River Watershed, which feeds St. John’s municipal water supply. In 2011, the Lynches…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Ummugulsum Yatar v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex, et al. (40348)
3:18:30
3:18:30
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
3:18:30
Appellant Ummugulsum Yatar was injured in a motor vehicle accident. Ms. Yatar applied to her insurer, TD Insurance Meloche Monnex (hereafter, “TD”) for housekeeping and home maintenance benefits, as well as income replacement benefits (IRB). TD initially paid those benefits. About a year later, following insurance medical examinations, TD denied Ms…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Eurobank Ergasias S.A., et al. v. Bombardier inc., et al. (40350)
2:38:10
2:38:10
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:38:10
Bombardier inc. entered into a procurement contract with the respondent branch of the Greek government (HMOD) for ten firefighting amphibious aircraft. There was also an Offsets contract by which Bombardier committed to offset programs inviting Greek suppliers as subcontractors for the work, for a total credited value of 110% of the main contract. …
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Attorney General of Ontario, et al. v. Mike Restoule, Patsy Corbiere, Duke Peltier, Peter Recollet, Dean Sayers and Roger Daybutch, on their own behalf and on behalf of all... (Day 2/2) (40024)
2:28:29
2:28:29
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:28:29
In 1850, the respondents, the Anishinaabe of the northern shores of Lakes Huron and Superior, entered into two treaties with the Crown: the Robinson-Huron Treaty and the Robinson-Superior Treaty (“Treaties”). The Treaties provided for cessation of a vast territory in northern Ontario, and for payment, in perpetuity, of an annuity to the Anishinaabe…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. His Majesty the King (40276)
2:13:21
2:13:21
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:13:21
A corporate taxpayer requested that the Minister of National Revenue exercise her discretionary power under s. 247(10) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) (“ITA”) to adjust the value of a non-arm’s length transaction downward, which would, in turn, reduce the amount of the taxpayer’s assessment. The Minister declined to do so. The …
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Attorney General of Ontario, et al. v. Mike Restoule, Patsy Corbiere, Duke Peltier, Peter Recollet, Dean Sayers and Roger Daybutch, on their own behalf and on behalf of all Members of the... (40024)
3:15:17
3:15:17
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
3:15:17
In 1850, the respondents, the Anishinaabe of the northern shores of Lakes Huron and Superior, entered into two treaties with the Crown: the Robinson-Huron Treaty and the Robinson-Superior Treaty (“Treaties”). The Treaties provided for cessation of a vast territory in northern Ontario, and for payment, in perpetuity, of an annuity to the Anishinaabe…
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Rudisill v. McDonough
1:10:16
1:10:16
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:10:16
A case in which the Court will decide whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service is entitled to receive all of the education benefits at once from programs associated with both periods of service.
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
Rudisill v. McDonough, Sec. of VA
1:00:20
1:00:20
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:00:20
Rudisill v. McDonough, Sec. of VAPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court


The Supreme Court heard a case on Tuesday about whether people with domestic violence court orders should be barred from owning guns. Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle joins Geoff Bennett to discuss the arguments. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/fundersPor PBS NewsHour
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
United States v. Rahimi
1:32:41
1:32:41
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:32:41
A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment.
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
United States v. Rahimi
1:19:35
1:19:35
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:19:35
United States v. RahimiPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz
1:18:28
1:18:28
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:18:28
A case in which the Court will decide whether the civil-liability provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act unequivocally and unambiguously waive the sovereign immunity of the United States.
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
Dept. of Agric. Rural Dev. v. Kirtz
1:07:23
1:07:23
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:07:23
Dept. of Agric. Rural Dev. v. KirtzPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Vidal v. Elster
1:15:48
1:15:48
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:15:48
A case in which the Court will decide whether the refusal to register a trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure.
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
Vidal, Under Sec. of Comm. v. Elster
1:05:05
1:05:05
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:05:05
Vidal, Under Sec. of Comm. v. ElsterPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court


The Supreme Court heard arguments in two key cases about how public officials use social media. The cases explore whether two school board members in California and a city manager in Michigan violated the First Amendment by blocking constituents from posting criticism on their personal social media pages. Geoff Bennett discussed the stakes with New…
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Lindke v. Freed
1:17:21
1:17:21
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:17:21
A case in which the Court will decide whether a public official’s social media activity can constitute state action only if the official used the account to perform a governmental duty or under the authority of his or her office.
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier
1:40:35
1:40:35
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:40:35
A case in which the Court will decide whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official’s personal social media account, which the official uses to communicate about job-related matters with the public.
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
Lindke v. Freed
1:06:26
1:06:26
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:06:26
Lindke v. FreedPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier
1:26:22
1:26:22
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:26:22
O'Connor-Ratcliff v. GarnierPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments


1
Culley v. Marshall
1:39:55
1:39:55
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:39:55
A case in which the Court will decide what test a district court must apply when determining whether and when a post-deprivation hearing is required under the Due Process Clause.
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States


1
Culley v. Marshall
1:25:49
1:25:49
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:25:49
Culley v. MarshallPor Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States


1
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 22-807 [Arg: 10.11.2023]
2:05:05
2:05:05
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:05:05
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the district court erred when it failed to apply the presumption of good faith and to holistically analyze South Carolina Congressional District 1 and the South Carolina General Assembly’s intent; (2) whether the district court erred in failing to enforce the alternative-map requirement in this circumstantial case; (…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
York Region District School Board v. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario (40360)
3:32:50
3:32:50
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
3:32:50
The private communications of two teachers, recorded on their personal, password-protected log were read and captured by screenshots taken by their school principal, and then used by the respondent school board (“Board”) to discipline them. The union filed a grievance against the written reprimand issued to the teachers (“Grievors”) claiming the Bo…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Don Johnson v. His Majesty the King (40330)
1:00:05
1:00:05
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
1:00:05
The appellant, Don Johnson, was found guilty of two counts of first degree murder by a jury. The majority of the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed his appeal, finding that it was open to the trial judge to leave party liability with the jury. Nordheimer J.A., dissenting, would have allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction, and ordered a new…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v. Pine Valley Enterprises Inc. (40197)
2:04:56
2:04:56
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
2:04:56
Pine Valley Enterprises Inc. (“PVE”) contracted with Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. (“Earthco”) for the supply of topsoil for use in a project. After reviewing dated test results for “R Topsoil,” it placed an order for 3,678 cubic yards of “Screened topsoil with extra Organics added.” The contract included exclusion provisions that allowed PVE to test …
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings


1
Jim Shot Both Sides, et al. v. His Majesty the King (40153)
3:15:45
3:15:45
Reproducir más Tarde
Reproducir más Tarde
Listas
Me gusta
Me gusta
3:15:45
On September 22, 1877, the Blackfoot Confederacy and the Crown executed Treaty 7, which established Reserve No. 148, the largest reserve in Canada. It is the home of the Kainai, or Blood Tribe. Under the Treaty, the size of the reserve was to be established through a formula promising “one square mile for each family of five persons, or in that pro…
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court


Students who are starting to apply to colleges for the coming year are the first class to deal with the impact of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn affirmative action. For many high school students, this annual rite of passage is now trickier than ever to navigate. Special correspondent Hari Sreenivasan takes a look for our higher education …
…
continue reading